Number One Concern

Is it possible that under the radar some keyboard operators are calling all the shots?

I am constantly embarrassed by my ignorance of PEDs and apps. I make fun of it just to hide my shame. My carpet cleaner said I can just Venmo his payment instead of writing him a check. I'm like "What's Venmo?"

So I make fun of awkward moments at the doctor’s office or at a party when I need to lean on my cell phone for some information. But the fact is technology is advancing at such a rapid rate it is nearly impossible to keep up with it. Only very young people who have grown up with computers and smartphones for their entire lives have a chance to keep up. They can roll with the punches while old folks like me are watching in astonishment as the applications multiply like rabbits.

That is why I wonder why so many supposedly "smart" people seem dumbfounded by the claims that a federal election could be hijacked. People like Bill O'Reilly, Mitch McConnell, Mark Cuban, Sean Hannity and Chuck Schumer simply can't fathom that a nationwide election could be corrupted by modern technology. They dismiss the issue with impertinency.

Go down the list of prominent political and media leaders who, to this day, reject the mountain of evidence that the 2020 election was corrupted. They are still living in a lateral, lineal, traditional "One-Man One-Vote" atmosphere when in reality the process of voting has morphed into a multilateral, non-linear, highly technical and electronic motherboard of networked systems unconnected by design, but connected by result. The complexity of which makes the results vulnerable to hacking.

There are so many factors involved beyond just collecting ballots that it takes a systems engineer to grasp what exactly an election consists of.

In fact, it is systems engineers that are essentially deciding more than any one election. They are engineering results in key races for the House, the Senate, and even Governors across the nation. They may well be creating the results they want in state legislative initiatives, which are then used to overrule other election results that weren't corrupted.

That form of complete systems control would indicate America is under authoritarian rule when it mistakenly believes it is democratically ruling itself.

I don't know about you but I have felt that way for years when election results and court rulings run so counter to everything I believe. It started with the redefinition of marriage, then approving school administration of gender medications without parental approval, then pampering illegal immigrants with free housing and medical treatments including abortions. In California illegal immigrants are allowed to join the Bar and practice law!

When it was declared Joe Biden had won 81 million votes, I knew intuitively something was wrong. The total number of votes counted in that Presidential election was so far out of the norm, so utterly counter intuitive, that I knew it was just a matter of time before the truth would emerge. The digital engineers weren't just hacking votes, they were creating them.

In years past voter fraud was essentially a paperwork manipulation scheme. Party influencers used powers of persuasion, voters were bribed, some were suppressed, intimidated or otherwise coerced. Now, behind the scenes there are forces at work that can overwhelm whatever influence voters might have.

We know about corporate lobbyists, big money influencers and celebrity endorsements and how they can swing large groups of voters. But how much does the average voter understand the actual mechanics of "collecting" ballots and processing them into reports that ultimately pronounce winners. How much do we know about how electronic vote counting machines are programmed? Only what the heavily subsidized and corporate influenced media tells you…

In truth, we know way too little, and trust way too much.

Because in today’s highly digitized world, that is where the rubber meets the road. It is in those tiny microchips where the real action is. Where numbers replace ballots, where 1's and 0's can be decoded with little or no accountability by those pesky digital engineers we all know exist but have little or no control over.

Is it possible that under the radar some keyboard operators are calling all the shots?

"Is it possible" is the key question because in this world of technological magic, anything seems possible and when it comes down to the immense impacts that elections have over trillions of dollars and how we exercise our freedom, the possibility that our vote is meaningless should be our number one concern.